Skeptic News: EPA Charged With Lethal Experiments

From: Forbes

A suit filed in federal court charges the Environmental Protection Agency with conducting illegal and potentially lethal experiments on hundreds of financially needy people who were paid $12/hour without even informing them of risks. Based upon thousands of documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, procedures undertaken since 2004 and continuing through the Obama administration exposed subjects at the University of North Carolina’s School of Medicine to very high levels of toxic air pollutants. Many of these subjects were already health-impaired, suffering from asthma, metabolic syndrome, and aging (up to 75 years old).

One of the pollutants was a fine particulate substance known as PM2.5, a major component of diesel exhaust which EPA had determined to be unsafe for inhalation at any level, particularly for health-impaired and elderly populations. The administration’s own Clean Air Scientific Advisory Council chairman, Jon Samet, stated that in a 2011 commentary published in the New England Journal of Medicine. House Energy and Commerce Chairman Fred Upton (R-Mich.) reiterated EPA’s position on this in a February 2012 letter to EPA air chief, Gina McCarthy.

It all sounds rather horrific on the face of it.  Though we should perhaps be cautious of the reports given the source of the article is Larry Bell. Bell is a climate change denialist and author of  “Climate of Corruption: Politics and Power Behind the Global Warming Hoax” and the suit has been brought by the American Tradition Institute.

According to Sourcewatch the American Tradition Institute  is part of a broader network of groups with close ties to energy interests that have long fought greenhouse gas regulation. Our investigation also finds that ATI has indirect connections with the Koch brothers, Art Pope and other conservative donors seeking to expand their political influence.  Specific claims aimed at the foundation include:

In 2011 In 2011, ATI sued the University of Virginia to get access to the emails of climatologist Michael Mann and in 2012, the Guardian posted a confidential memo prepared by a fellow of the American Tradition Institute (ATI) that advises how to build a national movement of wind farm protesters. Among its main recommendations, the proposal calls for a national PR campaign aimed at causing “subversion in message of [wind] industry so that it effectively becomes so bad that no one wants to admit in public they are for it.” It suggests setting up “dummy businesses” to buy anti-wind billboards, and creating a “counter-intelligence branch” to track the wind energy industry. It also calls for spending $750,000 to create an organisation with paid staff and tax-exempt status dedicated to building public opposition to state and federal government policies encouraging the wind energy industry.

In 2010 During the 2010 elections, the Montana Commission of Political Practices found that the organization broke state campaign laws by failing to register as a political committee or report its donors and spending. The state suggested WTP/ATP was involved in corruption and money laundering.

So there is the possibility that the science he expounds in the article is possibly flawed.

So Skeptics what’s the truth of the matter – have the EPA conducted another Tuskegee experiment or is this an opportunistic lawsuit?

Advertisements
This entry was posted in news, opinion, Science and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Skeptic News: EPA Charged With Lethal Experiments

  1. jdc says:

    University of North Carolina’s School of Medicine does do research with the EPA. They could be referring to something along the lines of the CAPTAIN study: https://www.epastudies.org/Public/EPAStudies/SelectedStudies.aspx

    What will I be asked to do?

    Have blood drawn to determine the type of GSTM1 gene you carry.
    Eat a special diet for six weeks.
    Avoid certain drugs and food supplements for six weeks.
    Breathe clean filtered air and air with carefully controlled amounts of pollution particles.
    Take part in breathing tests, including one called spirometry.
    Have your blood pressure and heart rate monitored.
    Have a brachial artery ultrasound (BAU).

    That can’t be the one as the upper age limit is 65 and it’s only for ‘healthy nonsmokers’. The two other studies on that page don’t refer to exposure to pollution at all. So not them either. Although they do refer to asthma and heart disease. And one has an upper limit of 75 years of age.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s