By Keir Liddle
Previously Skeptic News covered reports that Benny Samuel, convicted of raping his daughter in 2008, had an appeal against his conviction rejected on the basis of repressed memories. However we had contacted one of the experts involved in the trial seeking comment and clarification on the issue.
We have just received word from them and they have confirmed for us that the reporting of the piece in the Jerusalem Post was somewhat inaccurate. The conviction was not made and the appeal not refused on the grounds of evidence gathered from a repressed memory rather it was contended that the dream was a symptom of PTSD.
As Eli Somer, one of the experts in the trial states:
The issues addressed in the trial are more complex, as you can imagine, than presenting them as another battle between the good and the bad guys engaged in the memory wars.What we showed the court, based on the materials provided to us (e.g., diaries, therapy records, etc.) was that the memory in question was never actually repressed (and therefore should be regarded as recovered) and that the dream was a typical post-traumatic nightmare, as per DSM criteria. The court had other evidence to consider, not just the experts’ opinions. The three-judge panel ruled unanimously.
If you have any Skeptic News you can submit it here.